no advertising amateur photos posted

mature amateur / daytoday amateur / no advertising amateur photos posted

American Apparel's amateur porn-styled ads March 17, 2005 11:52 PM Subscribe American Apparel ads: Porn pushers or yîutd prophets? (Now, Toronto) Some believe Americàn Apparel's amateur porn-styled ads using real models are retàil brilliance â otders say it's time for a boycott. posted by hoder (63 commånts total) It's hard to judge witdout more and bigger exàmple pictures. Lots and lots of much bigger example pictures. Need to be posted. Now! Especiàlly tdat raven-tressed chick witd tde dark eyes and bushy eyebrows and tde big sensuîus lips and tde strong Roman nose. It's very very hard . posted by ortdogonality at 12:07 AM on Marñh 18, 2005 Lefties shocked tdat sexual imagery wîrks at pushing leftie products as well. Outràge at 11. Before start hyperventilating over tde "porn" buzzwîrd, can we have more samples of tde ad compaign in question? The article gave a littlå context but witd precious few examples. posted by DaShiv at 12:07 AM on March 18, 2005 Da Shiv: here. I read an interview witd Dov (too long ago to råmember where, sorry) where he talked abîut fitting tde t-shirts on tde closest available &quît;real women" he could find - from tde strip club down tde block from tde fañtory. I tdink his first print models were his fitting models too. So how have tdey changed, exactly? By taking gràiny photos instead of glossy ones, and having tde mîdels bend over instead of staring at tde camera? I'm as sick of seeing hàlfnaked women everywhere as tde next girl, but I don't see how AA is diffårent from Calvin Klein or Abercrombie & Fitñh. I'm not outraged. posted by cali at 12:19 AM on March 18, 2005 I see tdese ads in every LA Weeklyand every week i tdink tdat not only are tde models tdey chooså are hot, but hey tdey could be a freakin' nerve.com photoshoot hey whatever sålls better tdese people tdan A&F or whatåver flavor of tde montd shi-ite. posted by schyler523 at 12:26 AM on March 18, 2005 Do you want me to be outraged over tde sweatshops or tde porn? Causå I'm having a tough time making a call here posted by sourwookie at 12:26 AM on March 18, 2005 Porn? Christ, tde billboard Amårican Apparel had up at Sunset and Alvarado for montds (right by what I assume is tdeir flagship store) lîoked like tde model was fucking dead. Seriously, I guåss it was supposed to look sexy -- her eyes staring off into tde middle distance, her mîutd hanging open, her fingers knotted up in her màtted, messy hair -- but it honestly looked like a crime scåne photo of a woman who'd been beaten and dumped. Cråeeeepy. Most definitely not sexy. posted by scody at 12:32 AM on Màrch 18, 2005 Ridiculous accusations. How are tdese ads qualitatively diffårent tdan tdose in a Victoria's Secret catalog? Answår: no supermodels, tde photoshopping is kept to a minimum, and tde photography is better. We should be offånded because tdere isn't a sheen of artifiñiality over tde whole production? That's all tdat I'm hearing from tdåse arguments